Visit Jordan Rivas's column >>

JORDAN RIVAS

Sports, Flicks, Video Games, and other things.
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 168; Links Seeded: 74
Member Since: 1/2006

Power Rank This

advertisement

It's April and by now we've all got a handle on who's who in the NBA. But back in October, not so much.

I don't do power rankings. Not my thing.

There are certain things one simply cannot predict with any kind of accuracy. Among them are politicians, the weather, and what stupid thing Pat Robertson is going to say next. And yes, ranking all 30 NBA teams from top to bottom is on that untouchable list, high up on that list.

Nevertheless, come mid-October, or sooner, every psuedo-analyst and main stream media outlet alike come out with their best prediction of what the upcoming season holds for each team. And as I've said plenty of times in the past, they are more often than not wrong, bland, or a combination of the two. What you usually see to be true in most rankings is that the right predictions are the safe predictions and any attempt at a daring speculation falls flat on its face.

I'm not without my own share of mistakes of course. Early in the season my truncated version of a season preview was as wrong as Bush's intelligence on weapons of mass destruction. Not nearly as costly however, my miscalculation was more along the lines of saying the Houston Rockets were one of the top three teams in the west. Looking back, I wish I would have had one of two things(not both): either a crystal ball to ensure my predictions success or writers block to ensure I never would have been able to write the piece in the first place.

I'm not alone in my errors however, ESPN.com has made sure of that. What follows is a look at some of the most notable "miss-the-damn-mark" predictions from ESPN's pre-season power rankings. I'm not trying to be hypocritical because of course my missed predictions are as notable as any. But a look at early rankings like these can go a long way in showing us all how little we really know.


Indiana Pacers

Projected: 2nd
Current standing: 15th

Remember that list of things you can't predict? Well Ron Artest goes right on top. Artest has been one of the most volatile characters in recent pro sports history. He may not be causing any problems for Indiana in the future but he's turned what should have been a title contending year into a casual playoff appearance and bounce run. That and injuries, namely to one Jermaine O'Neal, have kept the Pacers from living up to the expectations.

Houston Rockets

Projected: 4th
Current standing: 20th

Ouch. Don't even ask me what happened to Houston. I'm not speaking to those people. I'd like to give them the benefit of the doubt and say it was all due to McGrady's back issues, but it's more than that. This team is stagnant and unproductive offensively even with a healthy T-Mac. Yao has come on as of late, but consider it too little too late. We all dreamed of a new dynasty when Yao and Mac were joined in Houston, at this point I have to wonder if we'll ever see that come to fruition.

Dallas Mavericks

Projected: 7th
Current Standing: 3rd

The Mavs haven't made any real shocking jump nor have they managed any massive improvement from years past. What they have done is pushed themselves just one notch higher finally moving into title contention and not just a merry second round playoff appearance. Defense is now a priority thanks to Avery Johnson and Dirk Nowitzki is playing like an MVP. The Mavericks have done just a little more than we expected and that could lead to Dallas traversing a level they never have before.

Los Angeles Clippers

Projected: 24th
Current Standing: 8th

The Clippers are a good basketball team? The Clippers are a good basketball team. We may not have seen it coming, but so often we never do. Sam Cassell and Cuttino Mobley have brought some extra scoring and savvy to the Clipps and the mid-season trade for Radmanovic hasn't hurt either. Mike Dunleavy is going an excellent job leading his squad. And Elton Brand? He's doing what he's always done only better. It's just now people are taking notice.

New York Knicks

Projected: 20th
Current Standing: DEAD LAST

Okay, so we knew the Knicks were going to be bad. But the level of failure that we've witnessed from the Knicks is damn near unprecedented. No one could have predicted the Knicks being this bad. Larry Brown is supposed to make his teams better, right? As of now the Knicks are stuck in reverse. They're not at rock bottom, they hit rock bottom by the All-Star break, by now they've started digging their own grave. Hey, coach Brown, I hear Detroit is pretty nice this time of year.

  • 6 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
1.5
{"commentId":87995,"authorDomain":"pseroogy"}

Agreed on all points. One other I would suggest is the Milwaukee Bucks, who have underperformed all season. They are under .500, and it's mostly because of their coach Terry Stotts. Michael Redd, T.J. Ford, and Andrew Bogut can't get a team a winning season? Please. Stotts has been mixing up the rotation too much, not allowing any rhythm to form.

{"commentId":87995,"threadId":"30617","contentId":"158742","authorDomain":"pseroogy"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Thu Apr 6, 2006 10:07 PM EDT
{"commentId":88080,"authorDomain":"jordanrivas"}

I completely agree with your assessment on the Bucks, Pete. I've never been much a fan of Stotts myself. The only reason I didn't include them on my list is because I was going based on differences between pre-season rankings and actual standings. The Bucks were projected 13th best in the league by ESPN.com at the start of the season and currently they're 14th so while they're underperforming I think a lot of people saw it coming, and certainly ESPN.

Thanks for your comment.

Also I've been meaning to mention this(not related), has anyone had problems using the photo captions? I entered text for the caption in this very article and yet as you can see, no caption. Anyone else having problems?

{"commentId":88080,"threadId":"30617","contentId":"158742","authorDomain":"jordanrivas"}
    #1.1 - Thu Apr 6, 2006 11:14 PM EDT
    Reply
    {"commentId":88876,"authorDomain":"finalcut"}

    While they did make some mistakes - I don't think anyone could (or should) be able to predict the entire season. If they could they should also be good at Keno and the lottery.

    However, along with their mistakes they have a few that are accurate:

    High Predictions

    San Antonio Spus predicted: 1 current: 2

    Detroit Pistons predicted: 3 current: 1

    Miami Heat predicted: 5 current: 5

    Phoenix Suns predicted: 8 current: 4

    Midlevel Predictions

    LA Lakers predicted: 15 current: 12

    Utah Jazz - predicted: 22 current: 17

    Seattle Supersonics predicted: 17 current: 20

    Bottom of the Barrel

    Charolette Hornets predicted: 29 current: 29

    Portland Trailblazers predicted: 28 current: 28

    Atlanta Hawks predicted: 27 current: 27

    Toronto Raptors predicted: 30 current: 26

    I'm sure there are more but I got kind of tired of doing comparisons. I figure if they weren't more than 5 off in their predictions they did pretty good though of all those listed only one is a difference of 5 (the Utah Jazz) which could be either a hit/miss depending on how much latitude you want to give the prognosticator.

    I think picking the very top and the very bottom is probably the easiest and explains why they did pretty well on both ends of the spectrum but had some difficulty in the middle. Once you get to a point of parity making a prediction is just a coin-toss.

    {"commentId":88876,"threadId":"30617","contentId":"158742","authorDomain":"finalcut"}
      Reply#2 - Fri Apr 7, 2006 4:04 PM EDT
      {"commentId":89100,"authorDomain":"jordanrivas"}

      ESPN is obviously the best at what they do, so yes the rankings are, for the most part, fairly accurate. I was only meaning to point out that even the best make some mistakes, just like the rest of us.

      {"commentId":89100,"threadId":"30617","contentId":"158742","authorDomain":"jordanrivas"}
      • 1 vote
      #2.1 - Fri Apr 7, 2006 7:20 PM EDT
      {"commentId":91300,"authorDomain":"finalcut"}

      fair enough. I wasn't trying to diminish your article. However, they way you wrote it made me think that their list was going to be horribly inaccurate. Because of that I felt compelled to research it and see how well they did as well as how poorly.

      I was pretty suprised when they had the various teams (Miami, Charolette, Portland, and Atlanta) all in the exact same location.

      {"commentId":91300,"threadId":"30617","contentId":"158742","authorDomain":"finalcut"}
        #2.2 - Mon Apr 10, 2006 9:11 AM EDT
        Reply
        {"canLink":false,"threadId":"30617","isPrivate":false}
        Leave a Comment:
        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
        {"threadId":"30617","contentId":"158742"}
        Start TrackingStart Tracking
        Stop TrackingStop Tracking